Acquire or license
Acquisition, licensing, and pilots are possible. Start with the right path.
Review individual applications, portfolio subsets, licensing paths, pilot options, or acquisition fit. Start with public briefs. Deeper technical and commercial materials are shared only after the request is qualified.
Buyer posture
A good buyer can operate the software responsibly.
The review path focuses on operational capacity, intended use, and what a buyer would need to maintain the application after transfer.
18
Portfolio apps
1
License-ready
By request
Materials
Acquire a single application
Best fit when one application has strong problem-solution alignment, clear transfer scope, and a focused diligence track.
Review app catalogEvaluate a portfolio subset
Best fit when multiple related applications in training simulation, survivor safety, grant operations, or policy workflows should be reviewed together.
Request portfolio briefStart with licensing or pilot review
Best fit when a buyer wants to validate operational fit before discussing broader transfer or acquisition terms.
Discuss licensingQualified buyers usually bring
- Mission-aligned intended use with a credible operating context.
- A clear reason for acquisition, licensing, or pilot review.
- Capacity to maintain, govern, and safely deploy the application after transfer.
- Willingness to evaluate maturity, gaps, and risk posture honestly.
Usually not a fit when
- Use cases create foreseeable harm for survivors or other vulnerable users.
- Requests require unrestricted redistribution of controlled-review materials.
- Buyers want to overstate maturity or skip app-specific diligence review.
- Safe stewardship, support, or privacy obligations are not credible.
Review process
A staged path from intent to agreement.
Fit and scope review
Review buyer intent, app scope, intended use, and whether the request belongs in acquisition, licensing, or pilot review.
Scoped next-step recommendation.
Portfolio or app brief
Qualified buyers receive a structured brief covering relevant applications, stage, readiness, documentation posture, and transfer boundaries.
Scoped brief that narrows review.
By request review
Approved reviewers receive app-specific materials covering technical posture, documentation, known gaps, and commercial structure.
Grounded view of risk and transfer effort.
Decision and agreement path
If fit remains strong, licensing, acquisition, or phased transfer terms are structured without artificial urgency or inflated claims.
Transaction path aligned with maturity.
Valuation framing
Value should follow evidence.
Commercial conversations account for development cost, readiness, documentation, handoff complexity, buyer fit, and the safety obligations attached to the intended use.
- App maturity
- Documentation posture
- Transfer scope and strategic fit
- Operational complexity and support requirements
Review materials
What review may include
Next step
Ready to evaluate acquisition, licensing, or pilot fit?
Start with the public catalog, then request review materials for the asset, subset, or implementation context.