Survivor Safety Sentinel is a controlled-review browser-based prototype for domestic violence survivor risk reflection and safety planning. It combines local assessment workflows for danger, lethality, stalking, technology abuse, economic abuse, reproductive coercion, and readiness for change with a context-aware safety plan wizard, grounding support, Quick Exit, local erase, privacy pause, masked plan view, safety library resources, and AI-assisted assessment analysis and safety-plan generation. It should be positioned for private diligence or controlled pilot planning only until AI credential handling, data privacy, security, legal, clinical, accessibility, and survivor-safety validation are complete.
Privacy-first survivor safety assessment and planning prototype with cross-assessment intelligence and AI-assisted safety-plan generation
Representative product diagram based on public-safe app positioning. No sensitive data shown.Public-safe preview
Asset type
Survivor safety assessment and planning prototype
Controlled-review prototype combining local survivor-safety assessments, risk scoring, safety planning, Quick Exit, privacy pause, masked plan view, safety resources, and AI-assisted plan generation.
Demo posture
Controlled review only. The
Controlled review only. The repo can be run locally as a browser-based prototype, but no public launch, production backend, server-side AI proxy, automated test pass, automated testing workflow, legal review, clinical validation, privacy review, accessibility audit, survivor-safety validation, or production data-handling review was verified.
Best fit
Domestic violence coalitions, legal aid organizations, family justice centers, advocacy programs, or public-interest technology buyers prepared to harden a sensitive local-first AI prototype before real-world deployment.
Domestic violence survivors in controlled-review or guided pilot contexts, Domestic violence advocates and safety planning programs
Buyer paths
Controlled review • Pilot • Partnership • Acquisition
Trust signals
Public-safe indicators buyers can use before requesting deeper materials.
Working browser-based implementationSeven assessment pathways represented in the type model and assessment constantsLocal risk scoring service for core assessment typesAI-assisted assessment analysis and safety-plan generationQuick Exit, Erase Data, PrivacyShield, grounding, and masked view controls
Product thesis
Why this asset exists
Survivors may face overlapping risks involving lethal violence, stalking, reproductive coercion, economic abuse, digital surveillance, legal concerns, children, pets, accessibility needs, immigration concerns, and readiness to change. Survivor Safety Sentinel was built to help users reflect across multiple safety dimensions, then generate a plan that fits their situation while keeping the experience local-first, cautious, and grounded in privacy and safety controls.
01
Buyer need
Survivor safety planning is rarely one-dimensional. Risk may involve lethal escalation, stalking, technology abuse, coerced debt, reproductive coercion, housing instability, children, pets, disability accommodations, immigration concerns, and readiness to change. At the same time, digital tools can increase danger if they expose sensitive data, overclaim clinical or legal validity, mishandle AI prompts, or fail to account for monitored devices.
Survivor risk and safety planning often spans physical danger, stalking, digital abuse, finances, reproductive coercion, readiness, children, pets, legal concerns, accessibility, and housing.
Sensitive safety planning apps can increase danger if used on monitored devices or if data storage and AI boundaries are unclear.
Automated risk and safety outputs can be harmful if presented as legal, clinical, or emergency guidance.
Client-side AI prototypes need stronger credential handling and privacy review before real-world use.
02
Product response
Survivor Safety Sentinel provides a local-first assessment and planning prototype. Users complete structured risk and readiness assessments, receive locally calculated risk outputs, optionally view AI-generated analysis, answer contextual safety planning questions, and generate a personalized safety plan with immediate priorities, digital safety steps, cultural resources, safety maps, and scripts. The app also includes Quick Exit, local erase, inactivity privacy pause, grounding tools, a masked plan view, legal disclaimers, and topic-specific safety resources.
Combines multiple risk and readiness assessments into one guided planning experience.
Generates a structured safety plan from assessment results and user-provided context.
Adds safety controls including Quick Exit, local erase, inactivity hiding, grounding, and masked plan view.
Keeps buyer-facing language conservative and requires qualified review before launch.
Capabilities
What buyers evaluate first
These are the product behaviors, workflows, and evidence points a buyer can scan before requesting deeper materials.
Cross-assessment risk reflection
Structured workflows help users reflect across danger, lethality, stalking, tech abuse, economic abuse, reproductive coercion, and readiness dimensions.
1
Context-aware safety planning
A guided wizard captures living situation, legal concerns, accessibility needs, community context, children, pets, technology access, and goals.
2
Safety controls and masking
Quick Exit, local erase, inactivity privacy pause, grounding, and masked plan view support safer controlled review of sensitive content.
3
Interface previews
Public-safe product visuals
Previews use demo, redacted, or representative content so buyers can inspect the interface without exposing sensitive data.
Representative diagram
Representative diagram1 of 1
Representative diagram
Representative product diagram based on public-safe app positioning. No sensitive data shown.
Use cases
Where this asset fits
Controlled prototype review
A survivor-safety technology team evaluates the assessment flows, local risk logic, AI prompts, safety plan structure, and privacy controls before deciding whether to harden it.
Advocate-guided pilot planning
A qualified program tests whether cross-assessment reflection can support safety planning using mock or carefully consented pilot data.
Safety UX validation
A DV or tech-abuse program reviews Quick Exit, Erase Data, PrivacyShield, masked mode, and grounding behavior for monitored-device risk.
AI safety-plan assessment
A buyer evaluates whether AI-generated plan sections can support advocate-reviewed safety planning without overclaiming legal, clinical, or emergency validity.
Review package
What transfers, what stays gated, and what needs verification.
The public brief gives buyers a safe first pass. Deeper implementation and operational materials stay controlled by fit review.
Documentation
Public overview available. Detailed documentation is gated for controlled review.
Review by request
Testing / QA
QA evidence is available in controlled review and should be freshly verified before buyer reliance.
Controlled review
Transfer boundary
Transfer scope is reviewed privately during app-specific diligence.
Controlled review
Included assets
Browser-based app source — Implemented
App shell and page navigation structure — Implemented
Assessment dashboard — Implemented
DA, LAP, SHARP, TECH, SEA-12, RCS-9, and DVSA assessment content — Implemented
Local risk scoring service — Implemented
AI assessment analysis — Implemented; production AI handling requires hardening
AI safety-plan generation — Implemented; production AI handling requires hardening
Safety plan wizard — Implemented
Safety plan viewer with progress tracking — Implemented
Automated testing and release runbook — Not verified
License or sale terms — By inquiry
Commercial paths
acquisitionpartnershippilotcustomization
Controlled review
Private review of source code, assessment logic, AI prompts, local storage behavior, safety controls, and survivor-safety risks.
Pilot partnership
Limited pilot planning after backend proxying, tests, privacy/legal/clinical review, accessibility review, and safety validation.
Acquisition
Transfer of the prototype repo and supporting documentation with buyer-led hardening before launch.
Evidence and review posture
Public evidence boundary
This section shows only public-safe evidence language. Deeper technical, security, billing, operational, transfer, and implementation materials stay gated.
Public overview
Available
Public pages provide buyer-centered positioning, fit, use cases, and a controlled next step without implementation details.
Private walkthrough
By request
A private walkthrough can be requested for qualified review. No public demo access is implied.
QA evidence
Controlled review
QA evidence is available in controlled review and should be freshly verified before buyer reliance.
Gated materials
Not public
Technical, security, billing, operational, transfer, and implementation materials are gated and are not included in the public portfolio payload.
What is public versus controlled review
Public pages are designed for discovery: product overview, use case, high-level features, category, and public-safe readiness summary. Deeper technical, security, billing, operational, transfer, and implementation materials are shared selectively after review.
Roadmap labels distinguish completed work from active hardening or planned next steps.
Browser-based app shelldone
Assessment dashboarddone
Local risk scoring logicdone
AI-assisted assessment analysisdone
AI-generated safety plandone
Context-aware safety plan wizarddone
Safety plan progress trackingdone
Quick Exit, Erase Data, PrivacyShield, and grounding controlsdone
Safety library resourcesdone
Legal and terms viewsdone
Server-side AI proxy and credential handlingplanned
Automated test suiteplanned
Automated testing workflow and exact-commit validation evidenceplanned
Privacy, retention, deletion, and local-storage threat modelplanned
Formal legal, clinical, and survivor-safety reviewplanned
Accessibility reviewplanned
Buyer handoff and launch runbookplanned
FAQ
Common diligence questions
Controlled next step
Interested in adapting Survivor Safety Sentinel for your organization or portfolio?
Start with a fit conversation. Public summaries stay safe to browse; technical, security, and transfer materials are shared only when the review path is appropriate.
