Texas TDV Resource Hub is an active-hardening MVP for school-safety and teen dating violence resource intelligence across Texas districts. It combines a browser-based dashboard with a backend service, AI-assisted district research, policy audit support, district profile views, reporting surfaces, database-backed saved comparisons, and controlled demo workflows. It should be positioned for controlled review, buyer diligence, or pilot planning rather than public launch until live data sources, security testing, SME review, legal review, privacy review, accessibility, and launch evidence are verified.
AI-assisted school safety resource intelligence for Texas teen dating violence response
Representative product diagram based on public-safe app positioning. No sensitive data shown.Public-safe preview
Asset type
Student safety policy intelligence platform
Controlled-review MVP for Texas school district TDV resource discovery, policy context, AI-assisted review, and report preparation.
Demo posture
Controlled review only. The
Controlled review only. The repo supports local demo mode and includes MVP application code, but no public launch, live users, production data pipeline, current automated testing pass, legal signoff, SME validation, accessibility audit, or completed security test suite was verified in this review.
Best fit
EdTech, civic tech, advocacy, legal aid, child safety, or school-safety teams prepared to complete data, AI, privacy, legal, accessibility, and security diligence.
Parents and caregivers reviewing Texas school district safety policies, Students looking for plain-language reporting and resource context
Buyer paths
Acquisition • Licensing • Pilot • Partnership
Trust signals
Public-safe indicators buyers can use before requesting deeper materials.
Full-stack browser-based and backend service app structureAI-backed district research, chatbot, PDF audit, gap analysis, policy-link, and grievance draft servicesDatabase rules are present and default-deny unspecified pathsEnvironment guide documents feature flags, AI, backend, CRDC, docket, analytics, timeout, and cache settingsRepo includes README, architecture, AI, data model, testing, audit, readiness, and transfer docs
Product thesis
Why this asset exists
Parents, students, advocates, and school-safety stakeholders often have to search across long handbooks, district pages, board policies, reporting procedures, and resource lists to understand where help is available and how a district addresses teen dating violence. Texas TDV Resource Hub was built to reduce that discovery burden by turning district research, public policy context, and resource signals into a clearer dashboard and review package while keeping sensitive use cases bounded by human review.
01
Buyer need
Teen dating violence policy, reporting, and support information is often scattered across school district websites, long handbooks, public data sources, board materials, and community resource lists. Non-technical users may struggle to find reporting contacts, understand policy gaps, compare districts, or prepare questions for advocates and school officials. Because the subject matter is sensitive and legal-adjacent, buyers also need clear boundaries around AI output, data handling, privacy, and human review before any public launch.
District safety, reporting, and TDV resource information can be scattered across long documents and public websites
Parents, students, and advocates need faster ways to locate contacts, reporting paths, and resource context
Advocacy and policy teams need district comparison and report-style outputs without overclaiming legal or safety certainty
AI-generated school safety and Title IX analysis requires human review before use in sensitive settings
02
Product response
Texas TDV Resource Hub provides a full-stack dashboard that organizes district-level school safety context, reporting contacts, policy audit outputs, local resources, sample reports, and AI-assisted review tools. AI-backed services support district research, chat, PDF policy auditing, gap analysis, policy-link discovery, and grievance draft generation. The current best use is controlled buyer review or pilot planning with explicit diligence around live data integration, AI accuracy, privacy, security, legal review, and survivor-centered safety review.
Organizes district-level school safety and TDV resource context into a dashboard
Uses AI-backed services to assist district research, policy auditing, chat, and draft preparation
Separates controlled demo value from production claims
Documents known limits around mock data, security testing, AI accuracy, and review requirements
Capabilities
What buyers evaluate first
These are the product behaviors, workflows, and evidence points a buyer can scan before requesting deeper materials.
District safety profile
Search a Texas district and review policy, reporting, contact, resource, and dashboard context in one structured view.
1
AI-assisted policy review
Use AI-backed services for district research, document audit, gap analysis, policy-link discovery, and chat support.
2
Controlled reporting workflow
Generate sample reports and grievance draft materials for review while keeping public copy clear that SME and legal review are required.
3
Interface previews
Public-safe product visuals
Previews use demo, redacted, or representative content so buyers can inspect the interface without exposing sensitive data.
Representative diagram
Representative diagram1 of 1
Representative diagram
Representative product diagram based on public-safe app positioning. No sensitive data shown.
Use cases
Where this asset fits
District resource scan
A parent, student, or advocate searches for a Texas district and reviews reporting contacts, rights context, resources, and policy signals.
Policy review preparation
An advocate uploads a district policy PDF for AI-assisted audit output that is then reviewed by a qualified human expert.
Buyer diligence review
A potential buyer evaluates the source code, docs, data model, AI workflows, database rules, and integration gaps before deciding whether to pilot or acquire.
Report-style briefing
A team uses the sample report and dashboard surfaces to brief stakeholders on district context, known gaps, and follow-up questions.
Review package
What transfers, what stays gated, and what needs verification.
The public brief gives buyers a safe first pass. Deeper implementation and operational materials stay controlled by fit review.
Documentation
Public overview available. Detailed documentation is gated for controlled review.
Review by request
Testing / QA
QA evidence is available in controlled review and should be freshly verified before buyer reliance.
Controlled review
Transfer boundary
Transfer scope is reviewed privately during app-specific diligence.
Controlled review
Included assets
Browser-based application source — Implemented
Backend service server — Implemented
AI-backed district research, chat, audit, gap analysis, policy-link, and grievance workflows — Implemented
Authentication and database client initialization — Present
CRDC and OCR/docket integrations — Feature-flagged with mock fallback
Testing scripts and AI evaluation tests — Present; current pass status not verified
Buyer, audit, environment, testing, and transfer docs — Present with gaps
Brand/logo asset — Remote reference only; copy local asset before public use
License or sale terms — By inquiry
Commercial paths
acquisitionlicensingpartnershippilotcustomization
Controlled buyer review
Private review of source code, docs, dashboard workflows, AI workflows, database rules, and live-data integration plan.
Pilot partnership
Buyer-led pilot after SME, legal, privacy, accessibility, security, deployment, and data-source validation.
Acquisition
Transfer of repository, documentation, configuration guide, and handoff materials with buyer-controlled infrastructure setup.
Evidence and review posture
Public evidence boundary
This section shows only public-safe evidence language. Deeper technical, security, billing, operational, transfer, and implementation materials stay gated.
Public overview
Available
Public pages provide buyer-centered positioning, fit, use cases, and a controlled next step without implementation details.
Private walkthrough
By request
A private walkthrough can be requested for qualified review. No public demo access is implied.
QA evidence
Controlled review
QA evidence is available in controlled review and should be freshly verified before buyer reliance.
Gated materials
Not public
Technical, security, billing, operational, transfer, and implementation materials are gated and are not included in the public portfolio payload.
What is public versus controlled review
Public pages are designed for discovery: product overview, use case, high-level features, category, and public-safe readiness summary. Deeper technical, security, billing, operational, transfer, and implementation materials are shared selectively after review.
Roadmap labels distinguish completed work from active hardening or planned next steps.
Browser-based dashboard foundationdone
Backend service paths for AI and data servicesdone
AI district research and chatbot servicedone
PDF policy audit workflowdone
Grievance draft workflowdone
Database rules for users and saved comparisonsdone
Feature-flagged CRDC and docket servicesin-progress
Validated live CRDC and OCR/docket integrationsplanned
Security rules test suite finalizationplanned
Current clean-environment build, unit, E2E, and security test evidenceplanned
SME review of TDV, Title IX, TEC 37.0831, and school safety outputsplanned
Legal, privacy, retention, accessibility, and safety reviewplanned
Buyer-controlled launch, monitoring, logging, and incident response runbookplanned
Public-safe screenshot and local logo asset preparationplanned
FAQ
Common diligence questions
Controlled next step
Interested in adapting Texas TDV Resource Hub for your organization or portfolio?
Start with a fit conversation. Public summaries stay safe to browse; technical, security, and transfer materials are shared only when the review path is appropriate.
